Water Journal : Water Journal August 2012
refereed paper governance water AUGUST 2012 65 indicated they had conflicts in their region and also highlighted the issues of conflict in their region, such as: "No rules yet established for environmental water. Issues regarding quality of water in lower reaches and licensing issues." "Large number of unlicensed users, difficulties with compliance." " ...users have complaints regarding lack of available stock and domestic (S&D) flows." To summarise, as one of the planners quoted: "[The] majority of plans have some level of conflict as a result of plan development". In case of conflicting interests, stakeholder involvement is crucial to resolve the conflicts by engaging in public consultations (NWI, 2004: Paragraphs 95, 96). Conclusions In Australia, as a result of the water institutional reforms implemented since 1995, water planning has become one of the most important tools for achieving sustainable use of water and, as evidenced in this study, water planners agree. The findings show there is a keen appreciation for and adoption of the values of the ESD policy in most of the Australian states and territories, and statutory water plans are definitely regarded as the right tool to achieve sustainable water use in Australia. Statutory water plans control water allocation by establishing rules for extraction of water for a variety of purposes, including maintaining appropriate environment flows. However, a major challenge is to allocate water between competing activities and the environment. This involves trade-offs and thereby raises the issues of fairness and equity (inter-generational and intra-generational). It is, therefore, very important to ensure that the process for making these trade-offs is transparent and involves sufficient community engagement. Furthermore, the study also found respondents favouring a federal system of water governance, suggesting a need for another round of water reforms to establish water governance at a national level (Brown, 2007; Wu et al., 2012). Establishing the National Water Commission (NWC) and allowing the Commission to continue as an independent agency to advise the Australian Government on national water issues is a positive step in this direction. Finally, water being a limited resource, there will always be dispute(s) over its allocation; so water allocation plans create winners and losers amongst existing and future water users, with the parties adversely affected often attempting to challenge water allocation plans in the courts (Preston, 2008). The solution, therefore, may be in enhanced consultation processes and in transparent processes in drafting plans. Acknowledgements The Authors acknowledge the National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training for funding this study. They also thank the water planners for their time and for participating in the survey. The Authors Ganesh Keremane (email: ganesh. email@example.com) is a Research Associate at the Centre for Comparative Water Policies and Laws, School of Commerce, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA. Professor Jennifer McKay is the Director of the Centre and Zhifang Wu is a Research Associate at the Centre. All three are also associated with the National Centre for Groundwater Research and Training. References Akhmouch A (2012): Water Governance in Latin America and the Caribbean: A Multi-Level Approach, OECD Regional Development Working Papers, No. 2012/04, OECD Publishing. Brown AJ (2007): Reshaping Australia's Federation: the choices for regional Australia, Australasian Journal of Regional Studies, 13(3), pp 235--253. Howard C (2001): Bureaucrats in the Social Policy Process: Administrative Policy Entrepreneurs and the Case of Working Nation, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 60(3), pp 56--65. Huitema D & Meijerink S (eds.) (2009): Water Policy Entrepreneurs: A Research Companion to Water Transitions around the Globe, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, UK. Huitema D, Lebel L & Meijerink S (2011): The strategies of policy entrepreneurs in water transitions around the world, Water Policy, 13 (5), pp 717--733. Keremane G & J McKay J (2011): Using Photostory to capture irrigators' emotions about Water Policy and Sustainable Development objectives: A case study in rural Australia', Action Research, 9(4), pp 405--425. Laban P (1994): Accountability: an indispensable condition for sustainable natural resource management, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Systems-oriented Research in Agriculture and Rural Development, Montpellier: CIRAD-SAR. Laban P (2007): Accountability and Rights in Right-based Approaches for Local Water Governance, Water Resources Development, 23 (2), pp 355--367. McKay JM (2007a): Groundwater as the Cinderella of water laws, policies and institutions in Australia, in S Ragone (ed.), The Global Importance of Groundwater in the 21st Century: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Groundwater Sustainability, Westerville, OH: National Groundwater Association, pp. 321--327. McKay JM (2007b): Water Governance Regimes in Australia: Implementing the National Water Initiative, Water Journal, 34 (1), pp 150--156. McKay JM (2005): Water institutional reforms in Australia, Water Policy, 7(1), pp 35--52. McKay JM (2010): Some Australian examples of the integration of environmental, economic and social considerations into decision making -- the jurisprudence of facts and context, in D French (ed.), Global Justice and Sustainable Development, BRILL, pp. 327-339. McKay JM, Keremane G & Gray A (2010): Picturing Fresh Water Justice in Rural Australia. CRC Irrigation Futures, p 101. McKay JM & Marsden S (2009): Australia: The Problem of Sustainability in Water in JW Dellapenna and J Gupta (eds.), The Evolution of the Law and Politics of Water, Springer Science and Business Media, pp 175--188. Moran T (2010): Ahead of the game: blueprint for the reform of Australian Government administration. Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, Canberra. National Water Commission (2004): National Water Initiative, www.nwc.gov.au/www/html/117- national-water-initiative.asp?intSiteID=1, accessed 27 April 2012. Preston BJ (2008): Water and Ecologically Sustainable Development in the Courts, Paper presented to Australian Sustainability Laws and Water Management: The Future Symposium, 17 October 2008, University of South Australia, Adelaide, South Australia. Roberts NC & PJ King (1989): Public Entrepreneurship: A Typology, Paper presented to the Academy of Management Meetings, Public Sector Division, Washington DC. Rogers P & Hall A (2003): Effective Water Governance, TEC Report No. 7, Global Water Partnership, Stockholm. Teske P & Schneider M (1994): The Bureaucratic Entrepreneur: The Case of City Managers, Public Administration Review, 54(4), pp 331--40. Wu Z, McKay J & Keremane G (2012): Governance of Urban Freshwater: Some views of three urban communities in Australia, Water Journal, 39(1), pp 88--92.
Water Journal September 2012-1
Water Journal July 2012